Surface environments contain heterotrophic microorganisms that
metabolize small molecules to gain energy. Extracellular enzymes then break
down the material outside the cell, making up the rate of microbial carbon
oxidation. Surface environments tend to have a faster metabolism than subsurface
environments, so the main take away from the study, Steen and colleagues were driven to determine how heterotrophs
in the subsurface have adapted to using the degraded organic matter to live. Little is known about the heterotrophic activity in
subsurface sediments, and whether they use the same mechanisms as surface
environments to undergo carbon oxidation. To get an insight as to how the
heterotrophic microorganisms in subsurface sediments acquire the organic matter,
peptidases in the sediment cores were assayed, and were then compared with
potential extracellular peptidase production from existing genetic data sets. The
study was done to give us a better understanding as to how microorganisms
survive in low energy environments and into the processes that shape the pool of
organic carbon that is preserved or oxidized over periods of time.
Figure 1. The X axis represents the sum of Vmax relative to modeled carbon oxidation
rates, while the y axis represents the depth of the sediment in centimeters
below sea floor (cmbsf). Figure taken from Steen et al. 2019.
The potential activity of the extracellular peptidases decreased
slower than the rate of organic carbon oxidation as the sediment level lowered.
As shown in figure 1, the lower the sediment level resulted in the ratio of
ΣVmax OC oxidation rate increase. The
evidence of the study raises the question as to which aquatic environments are
more suitable for gaining reproductive advantage by growing on a molecule that
cannot be modified by organic carbon.
Original Article:
Steen A, Kevorkian R, Bird J, Dambrowski N, Brett B, Hagen S, et al. (2019) Kinetics and Identities of Extracellular Peptidases in Subsurface Sediments of the White Oak River Estuary, North Carolina. Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 85 (19). DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00102-19
No comments:
Post a Comment